The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph not only reveals the utilization of energy in USA since 1980, but also gives the forecasts by 2030. Overall, it is conspicuous that the use of Petrol and Oil takes up the greatest consumption, while that of Nuclear and renewable resources remains relatively insignificant no matter for the past or future.
For Petrol and Oil, the figure continuously remains at the top of the graph. Starting as 35 quadrillion units, the consumption fluctuated in the first 20 years around 33. Afterwards, it rose constantly and is projected to reach at merely less than 50 quadrillion units by 2030.
As to another two types of fossil fuels, Coal and Natural Gas, their patterns are similar compared with each other, and both climb erratically before 2015. The consumption of Coal and Natural Gas (in quadrillion units) was 16 and 20 respectively in 1980, but met each other for several times afterwards. However, the use of Coal (30) is estimated to surpass that of Natural Gas (25) in 2030.
In terms of other resources, the use of them is all below 10 quadrillion units over the whole period, with the same starting point as less than 5. By projection, the consumption of Nuclear will rank No.1, followed by that of Solar/Wind, and that of Hydro-power will be the last among these 3 types.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81165919283 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7972790806 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9873663209 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118511635922 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049173793319 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582192371786 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693788119686 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313183972385 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.