The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied line graph provides the data of the USA energy using from 1980 as well as predictions until 2030 which conducted in 2008. In the brief observation, fossil fuel, comprises coal, petrol and oil, obtains the most substantial growth in the 50-year frame.
Apparently, petrol and oil remain its position of leading the first in the US fuel preference and due to its history, this group is forecasted to reach the peak of approximately 50 quadrillion units in 2030. While having started at above 15 quadrillion units, the coal has witnessed a significant climb that even might exceed natural gas in the future with the point of nearly 30. As a result, natural gas would be the least favourable fossil fuel in the same period.
Turning to other lines, three alternating energy, namely nuclear, solar with wind and hydropower, have an upward trend with small accelerations. Nuclear power and the section of solar and wind have rose slightly from under 5 by a mere number. Finally, after mildly fluctuating, hydropower may roughly stay at the same point as the beginning year of 2008.
In short, natural gas, coal, petrol and oil are predicted to acquire considerate increase while the others might take tiny shifts or even remain the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, first, if, may, so, well, while, in short, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61903030297 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671428571429 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6370593624 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902628577512 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386064858325 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640218038584 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553605548922 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056002283463 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.