The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The combination of four pie charts supplies the ratio of three different age groups in the populations of Yemen and Italy in 200 and predictions for 2050. In the brief observation, while the 15 - 59 years group of Yemen show the sign of increasing, its of Italy have the opposite trend.
Regarding to Yemen, in 2000, the first and second age group shared the approximate portion of 46,3% and 50,1 % respectively. In the future, the amount of citizens from 15 to 59 years old will exceed to lead the first place in the populations. Between the year of 2000 and 2005, the oldest group is predicted to witness a slight growth.
Turning to the other charts of Italy, there is a contrast change in the second age group. It is evident that it obtain a significant abduction from 61,6 per cent to below a half. Spontaneously, the proportion of people above 60 years old might express the growth of twofold expansion. Finally, the youngest group would have the same shift as Yemen which will decrease to 11,5 per cent.
In conclusion, through the above comparison, the distribution of population of Yemen and Italy did and might have different directions in both 2000 and 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...p of Yemen show the sign of increasing, its of Italy have the opposite trend. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79901960784 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71268894426 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2489175016 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180655655096 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715333477277 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069370089189 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12173906591 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580952263648 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.