The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The combination of four pie charts clarifies how the amounts of manufactured electricity categorized in different sources of fuel in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. In brief, both countries underwent the upward trend in the total production whereas the Australian generated more units from coal and France showed their preference of using nuclear power.
Regarding to Australia, there was a rapid increase from 100 units to 170 units in 2000 after 20 years. It is apparent that the coal electricity area expanded to nearly three fourth of the total with the beginning of a half. While the hydro power accounted for a major proportion by rising to 36 units per 170, the rest of oil and natural gas significantly reduced their segment to a mere 2 units.
Turning to the visual part of France, its distribution illustrated some similar features as those of Australia. The sum of electricity production augmented twice times to reach 180 units in 2000. In the onset of the 21st century, nuclear power exceeded other types of fuel to occupied about a half and a quarter. Coal and oil shared the same abduction to 25 units when natural gas, hydro power represented the last place with 2 units in total.
On the whole, two nations Australia and France obtained resemble changed but indicated a number of differences in resources of energy in electricity manufacturing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in brief, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01739130435 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82469530953 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621739130435 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5177564882 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243568325727 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929384871727 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080779877974 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14511600782 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759922036969 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.