The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts demonstrate units of electricity produced in Australia and France by fuel source in years 1980 and 2000.
From the chart for Australia’s electricity production in 1980, we see that half of the electricity was produced from coal. In the other 50 units, both natural gas and hydropower contributed for 20 units of electricity each. 10 units were produced by oil. Compared to 1980, the picture is very different in 2000, where coal was responsible for most of the electricity production, 130 units, followed by hydropower which contributed 36 units. Use of oil and natural gas reduced in a significant amount, both accounting for 2 units of electricity in 2000.
The electricity scenario in 1980 France was very different from Australia’s. Coal and natural gas each contributed for 25 units of electricity in the 90 units of total electricity production. Oil and nuclear power accounted for 20 units and 15 units electricity respectively, followed by 5 units produced by hydropower. Looking at the chart for 2000, it is clear that nuclear power took over most of the electricity production in France, producing 126 units. Coal and oil each produced 25 units of electricity, whereas hydropower and natural gas accounted for only 2 units of electricity each. The stark contrast of France from Australia is that Australia did not use nuclear power at all to produce electricity in both 1980 and 2000 whereas France used a significant amount of nuclear power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat half of the electricity was produced from coal. In the other 50 units, both n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13182796852 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429752066116 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8617931081 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261284281481 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133676047205 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927902572965 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267268639421 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108598435899 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.