The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the amount of electricity produced using five different sources of fuel in two countries, Australia and France, over two sperate years, 1980 and 2000.
It is clear, in general, that the total electricity production increased dramatically in both nations. While the total for both countries was similar, there were remarkable differences in the fuel sources produced.
To be more precise, rising enormously from 50 of the total 100 units in 1980 to 130 out of 170 units in 2000 in the manufacture, coal remained the most important fuel source in both two years in Australia. By contrast, in France, nuclear power which contributed only 15 units over 90 units in the total production in 1980 overweighed other sources to become the most considerable contribution in 2000, producing almost 75% of the country's electric power.
Furthermore, Australia depended on hydropower for just under 25% of its electricity in both two years while the amount of electric power produced by this type of power fell from 5 units to only two units in France. Oil, on the other hand, stayed relatively essential in France, but its use declined in Australia. Both countries, besides, relied on natural gas for electricity manufacture significantly more in 1980 than in 2000. Strikingly, although nuclear power has a crucial role in France, this fuel source did not be used in Australia during these 20 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so, while, as for, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11637931034 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85725797872 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556034482759 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8583011456 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.888888889 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236245579143 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106356892261 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523691110074 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160601205347 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490210440957 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.