The table describes in thousands the estimated and actual numbers of houses built in the UK by region in 2002.
The diagram depicts the actual and estimated numbers of houses built in the UK by seven regions in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that depending on particular regions, significant differences were seen between actual and estimated numbers. However, in most cases, the expected number was below the number of houses which were built.
To be more precise, the highest numbers of houses were constructed in Southern England (77,500), London (47,800), and in Central England (16,200), far exceeding the estimates of 51,100, 24,800 and 8,100 respectively. Similarly, in the North of England, there was a disparity just over 4,000 between these figures, 9,300 houses for the estimated figure against 13,500 for the actual one. Besides, Northern Ireland and Wales followed the same trend, 2,500 houses as compared to 5,500, and 2,900 opposed to 6,300.
Strikingly, only in Scotland that the number of houses which were built was lower than the estimated number of 3,000 and 3,200 respectively. Furthermore, Scotland was the region where the lowest number of houses were constructed in 2002.
In conclusion, it is easy to observe that more houses were built in the UK in 2002 than had been anticipated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23958333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61537172708 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1877818546 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385263113868 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193597972419 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14921842827 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278125485052 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156329928848 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.