The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The table compares the average distance that one person traveled per year in eight modes in England between 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that, in general, although the distance traveled per person varied according to the mode, car was still the most popular choice in both two years.
To specify, increasing about 1.5 times from 3.2 miles in 1985, cur had still had the highest number of miles in the average traveled per person in 2000. Similarly, train and other mode were common usages in 1985 with just below 290 miles and 450 miles on the average respectively, their figures rose moderately after 15 years. Besides, although taxi was the least prevalent in 1985 with only 13 miles in the average, its figure climbed rapidly to 42 miles in 2000; however, it was still less common mode than the long-distance bus which has the pattern grew noticeablely from 54 miles to 124 miles after 15 years.
By contrast, an opposite picture can be seen in the rest of the modes. The local bus which was one of the most favorite choices in 1985 with 425 miles in the average dropped significantly by approximately 275 miles in 2000. Meanwhile, there were decreases slightly in the number of miles in walking and bicycle. Strikingly, after 15 years, bicycle remained one of less prefer choices for people in England to travel with 51 miles in 1985 and only 41 miles in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, similarly, so, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72083333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40225227073 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545833333333 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9784975042 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130746692595 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689025481871 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651437963923 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109054832602 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712067060261 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.