The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides a comparison of the consumption of fish and meat in a particular European country during 1979-2004. The unit which was used in the chart is the number of grams per one person per week.
It is clear, in general, that although beef was the most popular type of meat at the beginning of the period, it was replaced by chicken from 1989 to the end of the survey. In contrast, fish remained the least favorite choice during this period.
In the first year, beef was the most popular with a consumption of about 220 grams per person per week. Then, this figure experienced a fluctuation moderately between 180 grams and 230 grams in the next five years, after falling steeply to around half as high as its starting point in 2004. Meanwhile, the pattern of lamb dropped rapidly from the highest point in 1979, at 150 grams, to the bottom with just below 50 grams at the end of the period.
In contrast, although the pattern for chicken was initially high as that for lamb, it witnessed considerable growth and reached a peak of approximately 60 in the last year. Strikingly, chicken was only the third common choice at the beginning of the period, it overcame others products to become the most popular consumption at the end of the period. Finally, while all other products saw a period of volatility, the use of fish had been relatively stable at around 50 for twenty-five years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, then, third, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67741935484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55572646681 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0133310549 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109754750932 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568566930611 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995035401421 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084919310153 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774816499918 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.