The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph provides the data which is figured in the UK and about the amount of commodity delivered by a variety of ways in the 1974 - 2002 period. In the general observation, there were great fluctuation in all modes but while the others had the upward trend, goods transported on the railway almost stayed the same point in the year of 2002 as in 1974.
First of all, the British showed the preference of using the shipment by vehicles on the road over the 28 - year time frame. Therefore, it led to the upsurge of this mean, especially in the end of 20th century, to reach its peak which is roughly 100 million tonnes. With the same accelerations, cargo followed the previous one by increasing significantly to occupy the second place (a mere more than 60 million tonnes of commodity dispatched). Finally, from 1974 to 2002, it marked the gradually climbing progress of pipeline delivery that its figure rose to over 20 millions of tonnes whereas the quantities remained the same in the transfer to the 21st century.
On the other hand, it is evident that the amount of goods transported by train had the opposite direction. It marginally decreased to reach the lowest point before augmenting to the approximate number as the one in 1974.
In conclusion, while the delivery on the road, water and railway expressed remarkable development, the amount of commodity though pipeline did change nominally in the UK between 1974 and 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...e delivery that its figure rose to over 20 millions of tonnes whereas the quantities remained ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69597922841 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9713411637 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168030612526 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641532990591 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494019000639 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104742051146 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497093420886 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.