The table below gives information on consumer expenditure on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
Given by the table is the reveal regarding the expense consumed on three groups of goods in five European states in the year of 2002.
As can be seen from the visual, most national expenditure originated from food, drinks and tobacco area which are led by Turkey.
Among three groups, the budget spent on personal necessities accounted to a large proportion in all five countries, followed by the one of fashion and leisure, education fields.
In addition, by analyzing the figure, it is apparent that the Turkish preferred using their expense in terms of both the first and the third group compared to the others, with 32,14% and 4,35% respectively. Meanwhile, in Italy, national consumer expenditure hit the peak of 9 percent involved to the fashion area. On the contrary, Sweden occupied the last place in the food and clothing group when having constituted about 15,77% and 5,4%. Similar to the Spain, its people contributed around 1,98 percent of money in terms of leisure and education needs in 2002.
The statistics provided a clearer look at how five European nations' consumers dispence their budget on a variety of items in the year of 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Given by the table is the reveal regarding the expense consumed on three...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, regarding, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97422680412 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5901382255 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.785294785 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10556514599 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454469177434 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432334011266 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062101060766 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419867748426 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.