The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
While the given pie chart provides the data of three major factors which are ascribed to be the causes of decreasing fertility of global agriculture terrain, the grid clarifies how they impacted on different continents in the 1990s interval. In general, it is conspicuous that a huge proportion of farmland was degraded due to over-grazing and Europe led the statistics of total affected land amount.
According to the pie chart, the depleted agricultural land by the livestock activities occupied a large portion of 35 per cent. Whereas the deforestation and the excessive plantation accounted for 28% and 30% respectively, some other reasons made up a nominal part.
Turning to the supplied table, although the over-grazing was considered to be the most influencing element, a massive number of land in the region of Europe was less productive because of deforestation and over-cultivation (9.8% and 7.7% out of 23% correspondingly). The following Oceania showed the contrary with the dramatic effect of livestock activities on the agricultural farm of which 13% was depleted. Finally, for the last place, only 5 per cent of farming terrain, in North America was affected and the over-plantation was the reason for about 3,3 percent of the aforementioned amount.
In conclusion, the whole visual illustrates how the agricultural land in three provided areas was less fertilized by the excess of grazing, cultivation or deforestation and indicates the rate of global land degraded by three of them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31932773109 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25533734679 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9009957315 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.25 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173136180323 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738664977086 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409346721768 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107738467398 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254277017592 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.