The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart illustrates the agricultural land affected by over- grazing, over- culvitation, deforestation and other reason on three different countries including North America, Europe, Oceania during the 1990s.
It is can be clearly seen that over-grazing play a crucial role on damaged three regions. Other reason out of three main causes, does not count numerous on the affected of tree country. Europe is the country that deteriorated the most. deforestation caused almost 10 percent, over- cultivation caused 7,7 percent and over-grazing harmed over a half percent respectively. Contrarily with Europe, Oceania damaged most by over grazing, which harmed up to 11.3 percent. 7 percent causes from deforestation and eventually, the total land degraded is 13 percent. Deforestation cause 0.2 percent in North America. Over- cultivation damaged 3.3 percent. Over- grazing is 1.5 percent. Naturally, North America is harmed less with 5 percent in total.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Deforestation
...the country that deteriorated the most. deforestation caused almost 10 percent, over- cultiva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00956856919 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634482758621 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6571717957 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8181818182 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1818181818 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112755654273 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467767313731 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590192084379 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127592043009 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572525424878 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.31 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.