The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart describes the main reasons why land for agriculture becomes less productive and the table highlights the factors affected three areas of the world, namely, North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation accounted for one third of total land degradation globally, but these factors affected in different regions vary.
The most significant factor for degradation of land is over-grazing by livestock at 35 %. There was closely followed by deforestation ( 30% ) and over-cultivation ( 28% ) and minimal amount 7 % is made up for other reasons.
By looking at the regions, Europe was the most suffered region of land degradation with 23 %. While 9.8 % of deforestation was the major factor, over-cultivation and over-grazing were responsible for 7.7 % and 5.5 % in turn. In Oceania, total 13 % of land was degraded.This was caused by over-grazing with 11.3%,was the highest rate for three regions. North America was only 5% was degraded by 3.3 % for over-cultivation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re was closely followed by deforestation 30% and over-cultivation 28% and mini...
^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s closely followed by deforestation 30% and over-cultivation 28% and minimal a...
^^
Line 9, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deforestation 30% and over-cultivation 28% and minimal amount 7 % is made up f...
^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estation 30% and over-cultivation 28% and minimal amount 7 % is made up for ot...
^^
Line 13, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actor, over-cultivation and over-grazing were responsible for 7.7 % and 5.5 % in ...
^^
Line 13, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ceania, total 13 % of land was degraded.This was caused by over-grazing with 11.3%,w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56441717791 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45162032133 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7429329151 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146024740534 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728563296582 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117227714698 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126214950472 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144958013732 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.