Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is irrefutable that the development of television brings numerous benefits for inhabitants. Although, there is also an argument that nothing can substitute books. Which aspect is more beneficial? In thin this essay, I will present my opinion.
Initially, television helps children learn through images and sounds at the same time, they can immediately know what the stuff it is with the explanation on tv without any striation. Kids are interested by the movement of character they just need to sit and watching them. Naturally, children can spend all day and all night watching tv. Also, lessons learned through tv it is also can be a song. With the melody, new vocabularies, new knowledge makes kids easier to understand.
On the other hand, spending so much time on television can harm a child's eyes while reading book is just make you get eyestrain. Books help you rad clearly either understand deeply the topic you are in. Can also engage in a group discussing a situation in a book. Children's imaginary significant blow out if they think about the story and draws a character on their own, things that television has already work it for your imaginary. If you considerable take care of a book, books are sustainable and their knowledge you gain from books are followed all of your life either, the information is easy to look up.
Eventually, television, help the education of children considerably, which also is the things distracted children. The knowledge electric box brings to is quite temporary. I believe learning through a book is the most efficient ways to help children remember things in the long term clearly either to contribute their imaginary days by days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ings numerous benefits for inhabitants. Although, there is also an argument that nothing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02846975089 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84149829079 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1205953361 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1176470588 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240373508455 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682628286944 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552919977427 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132888586809 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045731767969 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.