In the past lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students but now with the development of technology for education many people think there is no justification for attending lectures To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The curriculum has changed in many years later. The large numbers of scholars attend to a lectures is now leaded to a arguments whether it is necessary or not because of the developments on electrical devices. I will present my opinion in this essay.

One the one hand, technology help students can learn at anywhere and anytime. With the people they who faces difficulty to arrange and finding the place to learns so computers and the internet will help them a lot. When a guy has their own free time, they can easily surf the internet and seeking the information they want. If you engaged to a lecture not on times you may lose some information, hard to catch up and maybe the lectures is to crowd.

On the other hand, take part in a lectures can give you more essential knowledge. Even it is a crowd class and you have to concentrate hardly but it will make you understand clearly and received information effectively. Tutors have experienced on the process of learning, so they will teach us the pivot grasp, and we not ruin our time for spare. Furthermore, you can share your knowledge to yours fellows and in contrarian. If you still can not understand you can ask your tutor at the end of the class, tutor has their ability to answer your question clearly than the internet can do.

In the conclusion, technology brings many befits to education system however, get students a chance to meet a tutor and not giving them mechanical answer helping them lots on their expanding intelligent path.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (18 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lecture' or simply 'lectures'?
Suggestion: a lecture; lectures
...The large numbers of scholars attend to a lectures is now leaded to a arguments whether it...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s attend to a lectures is now leaded to a arguments whether it is necessary or no...
^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a argument' or simply 'arguments'?
Suggestion: a argument; arguments
...s attend to a lectures is now leaded to a arguments whether it is necessary or not because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lecture' or simply 'lectures'?
Suggestion: a lecture; lectures
...rowd. On the other hand, take part in a lectures can give you more essential knowledge. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'concentrate'.
Suggestion: hardly concentrate
...ven it is a crowd class and you have to concentrate hardly but it will make you understand clearly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67924528302 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63693404285 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6895829898 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3846153846 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151809166276 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516690709972 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427718537196 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879162263997 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389012459523 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.