The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The chart shows data according to a report of 2008 about energy consuming in America from 1980 with predictions to 2030.

Overall, the consumption numbers of petrol and oil, coal are increasing sharply within 5 decades, while the figures of natural gas, nuclear are experiencing a gentle growth, and the data with solar/wind and hydropower are remaining almost the same during the mean time.

Petrol and oil consuming quantities started at 35 quadrillion units(QU), had a fluctuation in the first 15 years then become raising steadily in the rest of the years and end at nearly 50 QU. Coal’s number began at more than 15 QU, rose to approximately 22 QU in 1995 and kept this number for more than 20 years, then gradually soars to double its initial number in 2030.

Natural gas’s figure had dramatic downs and ups throughout the period from 1980 to 2015, after that keeps a perfectly same number every year, starting from 20 QU in 1980 to nearly 25 QU in the year of 2030. Nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower consumption number was the same initially, less than 5 QU. Half century later, the figure of nuclear will increase by 5 QU more, whilst solar/wind will gently grow to 5 QU, and hydropower will still stay below 5 QU.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hydropower will still stay below 5 QU.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, still, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78037383178 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59547786961 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7924962524 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101235169713 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635555519534 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880533928195 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094596824319 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103535200268 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.