The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categorises, from 1995 - 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart clearly illustrates the total time that the British use telephones for calling in terms of local, national and international, mobiles in the 1995 - 2002 frame. In the brief observation, calls connected in local possessed the highest points and downward trend whereas the rest showed steady increase during this period.
First of all, it is apparent that the British have more preference for local type that it occupied the first place throughout the supplied term. Furthermore, after climbing up and reaching the peak of 90 million minutes called in 1999, the figure marginally slid down to over 70 billion.
On the other hand, another fixed line calls and mobile shares the same accelerations simultaneously. For national and international contacts, they showed a positive change of rising rapidly from under 40 billion to merely above 60 billion minutes of total. Similarly, calls made by mobile phone even had much higher speed of growing, especially after the year of 1999, which began at just tiny number and reached roughly 50 billion surprisingly.
To sum up, 1999 was the year that marked evident changes in both local and mobile calls while this figures of national and global contacts remained the sustainable upsurge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es in both local and mobile calls while this figures of national and global contacts...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, similarly, whereas, while, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26368159204 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67139648508 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696517412935 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2425731652 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160074966924 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667399386691 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524432437935 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871848064036 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051805422275 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.