The table delineates information about the ratio of matriculated students in the University of Bristol which the number indicated as percentage by answering to five distinctive questions over 1928, 1958, 2008 years.
Now, turning to the detail general entrance to the university reached its top with 6,377 students in 2008 prior to this it witnessed to 1,046 learners in 1958. However, the first-year was the fewest in the number if comparing with two years. The percentage between two genders in the beginning of the year pointed out little different trend such as, females (42%), males (58%). The following year it experienced another index like men saw 10% acclivity while opposite gender declined to 32%. In 2008, there was opposite change in the figure males place with 46% was taken by females whose was higher than 8%.
Another detail is the enrolments by distances which differ by 30 miles for local university attested a half in 1928 followed by a hurried reduce to 14% in1958. Foreign students were attended from 3 and 27 country within a tiny fractionin 1928 latter it uplifted the proportion of countries with its percentage.
From the graph, it is quite evident that the last year women student enrolled swiftly than men. By contrast, nearby livers pointed the least than overseas students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hange in the figure males place with 46% was taken by females whose was higher th...
^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of countries with its percentage. From the graph, it is quite evident that...
^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inted the least than overseas students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59047637984 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655813953488 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4989156485 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166486339871 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585437060594 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805744936693 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114551505437 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949007738362 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.