The table below gives information about the underground railway
systems in six cities
The given table details the statistical information defining the distance traveled (in km) in relation to the number of passengers who traveled using underground railway services in six different cities.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that although the underground railway system in London was the oldest one, the maximum number of passengers was recorded in Tokyo which developed after about 63 years. However, Kyoto and Los Angeles remained at the last on the chart with respect to both the factors.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, near the end of the 18th century, London(in 1863), and Paris(in 1900) established their underground railway facilities. Whilst the latter rode nearly half of the distance as compared to the former(394 km), the latter surpassed the former by 446 million passengers as against 775 million in London. Also, despite traveling only 155 km, Tokyo, which opened its underground system in 1927, witnessed the highest number of travelers about 736 million more than Paris.
Further, after covering nearly one-third of the distance covered by London's railway, Washington DC(opened in 1976) observed approximately half of the passengers as recorded in London. Moreover, Kyoto(1981), Los Angeles(2001) who traveled just 11km and 28km reported only 45 million and 50 million passengers respectively, the lowest numbers in the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nhatvynguyen711 | view | |
| 2023-05-26 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | tranhien862002 | 100 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | nltnhi2104 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | tragiang0606 | 56 | view |
- Essay on the topic of oil usage by four major consumers along with future predictions in a line chart 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 47
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over the last fifty years and there are few places that are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, third, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51388888889 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81444548625 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62037037037 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7308850305 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.875 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172317854852 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709193307734 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709137654144 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112116221272 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635985651359 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.