Various data about the subway system can be reported. When the underground railway system began to work, the magnitude of routes and the number of travelers who use this system for six cities are listed in the given table.
Overall, it can be observed that the size of older systems is more than the new ones. As a result, the cities which open the railway system in recent years sever fewer passengers.
According to data, London has the oldest railway system with the largest routes. However, Tokyo's railway is 239 kilometers less than London, but the number of travelers who use the subway in Tokyo is considerably higher than London. Albeit the railway size are close for Paris, Tokyo, and Washington DC, but the number of people who use the subway is only 144 million in Washington DC, while there are 1191 and 1972 million in Paris and Tokyo, respectively.
The data shows a significant drop in the railway size and the passenger number for railway systems opened since 1981. As it can be seen, the route's kilometer for Kyoto and Los Angeles is 11 and 28, which is dramatically less than other cities. For this reason, the passengers who use this system have a low number in these cities, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is more than the new ones. As a result, the cities which open the railway system...
^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'routes'' or 'route's'?
Suggestion: routes'; route's
...ened since 1981. As it can be seen, the routes kilometer for Kyoto and Los Angeles is ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71090047393 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34716327623 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8869502057 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206758941564 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967795417202 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763147258659 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151063120574 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873430998956 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.