Some experts assert that the government should invest more money in sport and athletes can receive more wage than others. While numerous others suggest paying more money to sportsmen or women is unfair, all professionals should be paid an equal salary. Both groups have their reasons, which will discuss in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, some people believe athletes are country representative in the global sports competition. This group outlines the winning in a competition like the Olympics is one of the government's power sign. As a result, they suggest paying a great deal of money to sportsmen/women is essential because, having no problem with living expense cause more concentration on the exercises, which increases the chance of success. So, sports professionals compensate for their high salary by winning competitions and gaining medals which are an honour for their country and compatriots.
On the other hand, a large group of people think that all professions should receive money considering their productivity. They claim that giving a high amount of money to athletes only because their job is unfair makes other people angry or disappointed. For example, there are excessive jobs such as doctors, teachers, firefighters, etc., who serves others every day or put their lives in danger and rescue other people. Consequently, giving the high fee to athletes only because they compete in front of the other country is not fair since several professions are crucial.
To sum up, there are two viewpoints about the amount of money paid to athletes. Some claim it should be high because they are country representative. In comparison, others think a significant amount of salary only for athletes is unfair compared to influential professions service others. I personally share the latter viewpoint and believe other jobs, such as firefighters or doctors, should earn more money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...re country representative in the global sports competition. This group outlines the wi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.300330033 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89711083777 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547854785479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3883986396 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340380566268 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106449593784 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070399158207 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196740295007 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331763354442 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.