The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table graph shows percentages of nat...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...in, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002. overall, most of the countries spend more on fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tobacco in which Turkey spent most. In food, drinks and tobacco category Tur...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...urkey percentages were under 7 percent. Whereas, Sweden spent least about 5.4 percent. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
..., Sweden spent least about 5.4 percent. Similarly in leisure and education Turkey was lar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the largest'.
Suggestion: was the largest
...milarly in leisure and education Turkey was largest spender with 4 percent.Italy and Sweden...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Italy
...rkey was largest spender with 4 percent.Italy and Sweden were hovering around 3 perce...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14965986395 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47132661277 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9705797495 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0550636048611 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283289995054 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567925347215 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826590648194 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826590648194 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Thanks test big