The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph compared the changes in the numbers of cars being used by British households in a 36-year-period between 1971 and 2007.
Overall, as can be seen from the graph that car ownership in the UK increased over the period surveyed. Particularly, households with two cars rose gradually; while households without a car fell significantly. Units are measured in percentages.
In 1971, the number of households with two cars was at approximately 8%; whereas the figure for families with no car stood at the highest peak, at nearly 50%. Over 36 years, both two figures fluctuated sharply. The proportion of households with two cars witnessed an upward trend of 20% and reached its highest point at 28% in the end; however, the that for no car families dropped dramatically to just around 25%.
Meanwhile, only about 44% of families having one car, compared to merely 1% of households with three or more cars. The figure for the former then remained so throughout the period, while that of the latter experienced a slight increase of only 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | www.www | 97 | view |
| 2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 88 | view |
| 2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 65 | view |
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK, 1999 -2008 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 84
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker. 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97175141243 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8473006862 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4709407663 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245319688905 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977522126065 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788332228003 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155594029177 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477681131542 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.