The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The chart illustrates how much food was consumed by an individual every week in the European continent at 10 years intervals over a period of 20 years, commencing from 1992.
In general, while the proportion of food consumed moved upwards, the pattern for that had some fluctuations throughout the timeline.
As far as the first year of the surveyed stint was concerned, the figure for vegetable consumption was approximately 2140 in 1992, which was the most common over a period. While the proportion of meat is higher than wheat, with respectively 1148 and 837 in 1992. Furthermore, the statistics of the bean are fivefold compared to the cheese over the period.
Thereafter, the figure for people who ate vegetables had a slight increase from 2002 to 2012. In addition, the statistics for meat tended to decline, with 1132 in 2012, while the figure for wheat and bean consumption had a significant rise over the period, at respective figures being nearly 980 and 600. finally, the proportion of cheese stayed unchanged throughout the timeline, with 125 in 2002 and 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an wheat, with respectively 1148 and 837 in 1992. Furthermore, the statistics of ...
^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ctive figures being nearly 980 and 600. finally, the proportion of cheese stayed unchan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03910614525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82738970036 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2723930468 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14533006953 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625343013495 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367793443544 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849061960746 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360841141121 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.