The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
The table compares six different nations in terms of their waste output between 1980 and 2000.
It is clear that waste production increased in all countries but in Korea. The US produced the largest amount of waste each year.
In 1980, the US released 131 million tonnes of waste, which is the highest amount among the six countries. The figure rose to 151 million tonnes a decade later and to 192 in 2000. Japan, which is the second biggest polluter, was responsible for 28 million tonnes of waste in the year 1980, and its output almost doubled to 53 million tonnes at the end of the period.
Ireland, Poland, and Portugal released far less waste output compared to the two nations above, with the figures being below 7 million tonnes in all three years. There was no data for Korea in 1980. However, it is the only country to manage to reduce its carbon footprint, falling from 31 million tonnes of waste in 1990 to 19 tonnes in 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57396449704 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20560096268 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.790695928 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377538744513 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145022418175 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599289072382 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21860589923 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353074080232 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.