Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do.
It is argued that artists such as painters, writers and music composers should be totally free in their artistic expression and, therefore, that their works should not be the subject to governmetal control. Personally, I cannot agree with this statement.
It is true that, to a certain extent, artists should feel free to present what is on their mind through artworks. Under some undemocratic regimes, artists are often find themselves under the pressure to produce pieces of art that endorse certain religions, faiths or political parties. These products, as a result, are not real art since they are interfered by the interest of minority groups. Moreover, when producing under such circumstances, artists often cannot make use of their potential, which makes them fail to bring masterpieces to life.
However, there are reasonable arguments for restrictions on art production from the authority. Firstly, if left to their own devices, artists, including amateur and professional ones, could create works that have a harmful impact on the general public’ perspectives and ideas. For example, pornographic images and violent videos would be given free reign to be on the market, which would wreak havoc on the mental development of the young. Another example would be songs or films conveying incitement to racial hatred or objectifying women, which could make the world become a worse, violent place to live. Governmental censorship and regulation are, therefore, necessary to protect the public from insidious materials and to maintain order in society.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should not interfere with the process of producing art. However, the end results of any artist should be cautiously reviewed for the sake of the public’s well-being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...works that have a harmful impact on the general public’ perspectives and ideas. For example, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: FREE_REIGN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'free rein'?
Suggestion: free rein
...mages and violent videos would be given free reign to be on the market, which would wreak ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39208633094 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85301691229 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63309352518 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.288667051 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275788619696 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815993250005 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737009311247 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166630773367 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057741647227 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.