The use of the mobile phone is antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people regard using mobile phones as harmful to society as smoking cigarettes, and, therefore, propose the same ban on it in public locations. Personally, I completely disagree with this view.
On the one hand, mobile phones do not pose the same threats to communities as tobacco does. One of the main justification for the ban on smoking is passive smoking, which means non-smokers could be as likely to have lung cancer as smokers by inhaling toxic fumes released in the atmosphere. However, the universal and most serious problem with using a phone in public is the annoyance of loud conversations on the phone, which can be disturbing and frustrating yet by no means as hazardous as lung deterioration itself. Therefore, it is oversensitive to put mobile phones and tobacco on the same level of risk to society.
On the other hand, it is absurd to impose such a ban. Mobile phones have become indispensable accessories that accompany people everywhere they go. They serve to entertain, educate and make people’s lives easier. As a result, being deprived of such a useful tool, people would feel a sense of frustration and resentment. Moreover, they are not only useful items, but they are also sometimes live-savers. For example, it comes in handy when people want to call paramedics in case of an accident or police officials in case of a murder crime. Therefore, there is no justification for such a prohibition.
In conclusion, it seems to me that mobile phones are harmless belongings, and people should be free to use them publicly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96923076923 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95949979781 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2413257965 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302749178983 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916543129353 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772078683999 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19620484416 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694682895392 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.