The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
The chart gives data regarding eight main consumer durables bought by British people between the years 1972 to 1983.
Overall, it is clear that there was a significant positive correlation between the time and the percentage of households owned these appliances, indicating that the number of households purchased the appliances increases considerably over this period. While telephone and central heating had the most increased rates respectively, television had the lowest rate of rising over 11 years.
In 1972, over half of the British families owned televisions, vacuum cleaners, refrigerators, and washing machines, at 93%, 83%, 73%, and 66%, respectively; followed by telephones (42%) and central heating (37%). The information about video and dishwashers were not accessible.
However, this trend was not completely reflected in the year 1983. While television and refrigerator appliances were the highest purchased rates among appliances and available for almost all British households, at 98% and 94% respectively, followed by washing machines, telephones, central heating, and videos, at 80%, 77%, and 64%. By contrast, only 5 percentage points of households had dishwashers in 1983. Despite the fact that the high levels of families used vacuum cleaners from 1972 until 1982, its data was not accessible for the year 1983.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a was not accessible for the year 1983.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67821782178 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99122986943 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1393056071 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119562171381 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522453881079 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531495530971 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821988112724 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551100576943 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.