The table below shows consumer spending on different items in 5 countries in 2002.
The table illustrates, expenditure on food/drinks/tobacco, clothing/footwear and leisure/education in five European nations in 2002.
Overall, in all the countries food, drinks and tobacco was popular on which the people have consumed most of their savings whereas as the least was spent on leisure and education. The figure of Turkey, was higher among the five countries.
In terms of food, drinks and tobacco Turkey was on the top who spent 32.14% which was double than the Sweden which spent 15.77%. After that, 28.91% was spent by the Irish people. Italy and Spain paid 16.36% and 18.80% respectively. The least amount was spent on leisure and education on which less than 5% of the amount was spent.
Spending cash on clothing and footwear was famous where individuals have paid double than the leisure and education. The figure of Italy was higher than the other countries which was 9.00% and Sweden was 5.40% which captured less interest in spending on these items. The remaining countries have spent an average around 6.5%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n nations in 2002. Overall, in all the countries food, drinks and tobacco was popular on...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13017751479 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85843528667 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508875739645 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8127835226 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779695723229 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359497325305 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378398054267 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636266428916 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393098813732 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.