The table below shows expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002
The given table illustrates how much money particular car enterprises spent on five different kinds of advertising in the United Kingdom in 2002. Unit are measured in millions of dollars.
As can be inferred from the data, the advertisement on television was the most ubiquitous, while the amount of money spent on promotion via cinema was the lowest. The companies spent a same amount of money to advertise their products on radio.
In 2002, all the given company chose TV as their main advertisement tool, the highest number was 70 millions of dollar paid by Cetirizine, followed by Vauxhall at 65 millions. The figure for Renault and Rover were 59 millions and 45 millions respectively. 15 millions was the number that each firms spent on promotion through Radio.
Neither Rover nor Cetirizine chose Cinema to advertise their cars in 2002, while the remain companies spent not little on this category at around 5 millions. Outdoor promotion was also not impress the companies since individuals spent only under 10 millions on this type. Regarding press, Renault and Rover spent 45 millions and 38 millions on media respectively, while only 8 millions and 12 millions paid by Vauxhall and Cetirizine in turn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 million'.
Suggestion: 70 million
...ertisement tool, the highest number was 70 millions of dollar paid by Cetirizine, followed by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 82, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... to advertise their cars in 2002, while the remain companies spent not little on this cate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.145 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77279642239 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5956138241 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969430708067 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450631836543 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524001503903 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681328481151 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344734874601 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.