The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods

The table illustrates number of tourist took visit of Ashdown Museum before the modification and after refurbishment and pie chart demonstrates result of survey given by tourists who were satisfied and dissatisfied before and after modification of Ashdown Museum. The scale is in percentage.

To commence with, there was 74000 visitors, who visit the Ashdown Museum before the refurbishment and it was increased up-to 92000 after the modification of Ashdown Museum.

Furthermore, as regard people, who very satisfied, it accounted for 15%, and experienced rise to 35% after modification. As regard people who were pleased comprised for 30% before the refurbishment, which increased to 40% after the refurbishment.

On the other hand, the initial figure for tourist who not pleased before modification was 40% and decline up-to 15% was observed after the modification. Tourists who were very dissatisfied had ratio of 10% before the refurbishment, fell to 5% after modification. However, people who had not given any responses remained relatively same.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er modification. However, people who had not given any responses remained relativ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60248447205 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21507626729 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4288735957 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222643744641 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975022169006 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097450730215 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16368026688 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925443640868 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.