The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure for tourists alongside their annual average expenses in the period of 5 years beginning in 2003 are depicted in the table. Apparently, the number of visitors, their yearly spending and average expenditure per trip recorded an upward trend while it is evident that the average number of nights spent on one visit witnessed an inconsistent movement.
From a quick glance at the figure for visitors, the statistic proliferated substantially from nearly 25,000 millions in 2003 to just under 33,000 millions and reached a peak in 2007. Nevertheless, the data then depicted a noteworthy fall of approximately 2,000 millions in the last year of the given period. Likewise, the amount of expenditure recorded the highest statistic in 2006 at slightly above 16,000 millions, which was followed by a minimal drop and quickly recovered to over 16,300 millions in 2008.
Moving on to describe the remaining parts of the table, it is prominent that the average spending on an exclusive visit decreased slightly by 10 billions from 2003 to 2004. In contrast, after hitting a bottom, the data illustrated a positive contradictory trend with an increase to 511 billions in 2007. On the contrary, the number of nights on average at first stablized at 8,2 nights in the first two years. Subsequently, it rose minimally to the biggest number in 2006 of 8,4 nights, before diving to 7,7 nights in 2007 and 2008.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, then, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04291845494 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84350878157 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8065795618 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.555555556 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146509248621 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603041529412 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444569359562 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103595559767 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443276195188 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.