The given table provides the ìnormation of the number of UK visitors and the average expenditure between 2003 and 2008
Overall, it can be seen that there was an upward trend in all categories except for the average nights per visit which experienced a slight decrease.
Turning to detail, in 2003, the number of visitors in the UK was about 24,7 million and the average spending was 11-pound billion, which was the lowest figure in the table. There was a significant increase in the visitors numbers and the expense to 27 million and 13 pounds billion, respectively in 2004. In the following year, the UK attracts nearly 30 million people came to visit and receive about 14 pounds billion.
In addition, from 2006 to 2008 the number of visitors increased slightly, approximately 32 million and reached the peak at 32,778 million in 2007 despite some dropping in the last year. Meanwhile, the expenditure fluctuated at around 16-pound billion. The average spend per visit increased gradually to 511 whereas the average night per visit dropped from 8,4 to 7,7 in the last 2 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...There was a significant increase in the visitors numbers and the expense to 27 million a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...the expense to 27 million and 13 pounds billion, respectively in 2004. In the following...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...me to visit and receive about 14 pounds billion. In addition, from 2006 to 2008 the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...at around 16-pound billion. The average spend per visit increased gradually to 511 wh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from 8,4 to 7,7 in the last 2 years.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61961308582 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9367013045 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190647895947 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859645947679 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566062528075 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135518200741 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924936177487 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.