The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. Summ

Below table graph depict the amount of visitors who went to Ashdown Museum in the year before and after its refurbishment. The following two pie pictures illustrate the satisfaction proportion of visitors who accepted surveys during the same two periods.

According to the table chart, during the year before refurbishment, there were 74000 people visiting this Museum, while the number increased to 92000 after refurbishment.

Regarding to the two pie graphs, first of all, the satisfaction degree of visitors rose from the previous 30% to 40% now. In contrast, dissatisfied visitors rate dropped to only 15% comparing to 40% which is the data onto the year before refurbishment. Similarly, very satisfied visitors proportion rose 20 percentage points to 35%, consequently very dissatisfied degree fell to 5% from the previous 10%. Moreover, rate of visitors who didn’t attend surveys was constant 5%.

In conclusion, after refurbishment, visitors number is increasing, also the proportion of visitors who were satisfied or very satisfied was rising dramatically, whereas dissatisfaction rate or very dissatisfaction rate was falling.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68604651163 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26777288731 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.59034515 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.875 5.23603664747 284% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361874071312 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159596235688 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789292124019 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233939792498 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779023729694 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.