The table displays the amount of tourist that visited Ashdown Museum pre and post renovation; while , the two pie charts illustrate an outcome of a survey done to note tourist's satisfaction as a percentage before and after.
The number of tourist increased post refurbishment. It is noticeable that there is an equal number of dissatisfied and satisfied visitors between the two periods. Interestingly, number of visitors who did not respond to the survey remain unchanged.
Notably an increase of 18000 visitors was recorded after renovations as highlighted on the table. Post refurbishment there was a 5percent decrease of tourist who were very dissatisfied compared to earlier evaluation. Similarly a larger part of 40percent was dissatisfied pre and post improvements of the museum. In addition an equal amount of visitors who were dissatisfied after refurbishment was similar to those who were satisfied before improvements.
Furthermore, as shown on the pie charts there was a decline of 25percent for visitors who were dissatisfied after refurbishment. Meanwhile, an upward rise of 20percent of very satisfied visitors was noted. Only a 10percent increase of satisfied tourist was recorded post renovation from 30percent before renovation to 40percent after.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wn Museum pre and post renovation; while , the two pie charts illustrate an outcom...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...tisfied compared to earlier evaluation. Similarly a larger part of 40percent was dissatis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...and post improvements of the museum. In addition an equal amount of visitors who were di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho were dissatisfied after refurbishment was similar to those who were satisfied ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60103626943 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27477030079 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502590673575 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7348155818 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254029114901 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111174988368 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480998082023 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174090736183 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155095010445 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.