The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table indicates the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum and the charts compare their satisfaction about the destination between two periods, before and after refurbishment.
Overall, the renovation made the museum more attractive. The prove was that the number of people visiting the museum was quite higher and the increase in satisfaction level.
In the first period, the number of visitors was 74000, in the second one this number raised to 92000, it is approximately 20000 bigger than that of the year before refurbishment.
The pie charts show five criteria to judge the satisfaction of people. Very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied and no response. In the year before refurbishment, 40% of visitors expressed their dissatisfaction, followed by 30% of people who were highly satisfied and the number of extremely dissatisfied visitors was 10%. In another period, it was 35% of visitors showed great happiness compared to the first period. The proportion of unsatisfied visitors decreased remarkably and the number of visitors who left no response remains 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...vation made the museum more attractive. The prove was that the number of people visiting ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47337278107 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13559223395 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7292849309 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401843854925 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148331665301 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902555655808 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223253399845 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745556488874 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.