The table below shows the percentage of household and electronic goods in New Zealand in 2002 and 2020.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presented the table illustrating the proportion of electrical equipment used in New Zealand families in two given years (2002 and 2020).
Overall, it is transparent from the chart that high-tech devices were consumed higher than during the research time-scale. It is also noticeable that while most electronic goods witnessed an upward trend, the opposite was true for the video recorder.
New Zealand households bought the washing machine estimate 97% of households in 2002. The figure was significantly higher than the equivalent figures for color TV and dishwasher at 95% and 45%, respectively. After that, both the three items witnessed an increase in the basic need to use with the most notable rise dedicated to dishwasher accounted for 10% compared to other things (washing machine, color TVs). It was only small grown, ranging from 98% to 99%.
Next, we can see that computers, cell phones, the digital camera were using more and more in 2020 because our lives have been developing daily. Video recorder had a considerable decrease from 75% (2002) to 60% (2020); meanwhile, a reverse pattern was detached in terms of the figures for computer, cellphone, digital camera, which accompanied an increase of 18 percent and 60 percent, 38 percent in order. There was the digital camera was grow the fastest in comparison with the two other items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...order. There was the digital camera was grow the fastest in comparison with the two ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13698630137 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68716708718 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657534246575 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6340693079 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117667202106 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057112601665 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698399172854 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810718799374 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501581665904 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.