Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
The government funding should use an effective way instead of supporting the arts and cultures. The essay will discuss the problem and offer personal sight on hand.
There are some reasons why the government should prioritize social problems and elsewhere than arts. First of all, in many regions, especially these impoverished nations, local inhabitants are now besieged with varied issues such as poverty, social unrest or unemployment, so on; accordingly, confronting with those problems as mentioned above, people from those countries would by no means immerse in aesthetic value. Therefore, social funding should be spent on essential items to avoid wasting money; thus, this is the best option for citizens when nation leaders practice the opinions. In addition, it is undeniable that a lend of competence is required when it comes to the appreciation of art and culture; however, people of such equality account for only a minority of the population. Consequently, government funding should be prioritized mass. Taking health and education as a prime example, they are crucial tasks, of which governments should also take responsibility. People benefiting from the programs, such as hospitals and schools, believe that arts are a luxury and the government cannot afford this extravagance.
On the other hand, based on my knowledge, I think that investment in the arts would be beneficial for both the government and aesthetic figures. War relics and cultural distinctiveness can be preserved and be bequeathed from generation to generation; accordingly, the places will become tourist attractions and help resident grow their income.
In conclusion, the government should not waste money on the arts, and that money should use to help shanty areas and compatriots. Significantly, the amount of the money that can use for manufacture in poor countryside
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ons. In addition, it is undeniable that a lend of competence is required when it comes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44636678201 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04217785256 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6504615413 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253555206991 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833198823204 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052830234824 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13079640143 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626295665019 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.