the first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the us and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015,the second chart shows the amount spent by the those visitors in that period.
the first bar chart illustrates the total of UK tourists to the united state and conversely between 2011 and 2015; accordingly, the second one indicates the figures of the expenses payable which passengers of the countries need when they travel each other. Overall, it is clear that the majority of UK visitors usually went for us and spent an amount of money were larger than the US visitors in the during given timescale.
according to the first graph, while tourism to the us dipped minimally year by year in the first 3 years, and the figure was hit a low of under 3 millions; however, it raised over the following 2 years, peaking at 3,5 million in 2015. besides that, the amount if the us tourists to the UK were quite fluctuate over the first 3 years period, but it still remained at least 2,5 millions in 2013. next, a similar pattern was seen from 2013 to 2014 like the total of the UK visitors to us that the data had an upward trend and accounted for the lion's share ( under 3,5 millions); in addition, the US tourists had still lower than the UK tourists at the end of the period.
in the second graph, it's apparent that the influx of currency of the UK people, which spent for travelling was higher than the US people. for the UK tourists, growth was slow until 2013, when it started to increase dramatically, reaching to peak at near 6 billions in 2015, whilst the figures of the US people for the problem did not fluctuate over the first 3 years of the given timescale, before it had grown sharply in two years(2014 and 2015) with 4 billions in 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the first bar chart illustrates the total o...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isitors in the during given timescale. according to the first graph, while tour...
^^^^
Line 2, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...ors in the during given timescale. according to the first graph, while tourism to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
... years, peaking at 3,5 million in 2015. besides that, the amount if the us tourists to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...if the us tourists to the UK were quite fluctuate over the first 3 years period, but it s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Next
...remained at least 2,5 millions in 2013. next, a similar pattern was seen from 2013 t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us that the data had an upward trend and accounted for the lions share under 3,5...
^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trend and accounted for the lions share under 3,5 millions; in addition, the US ...
^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, the US tourists had still lower than the UK tourists at the end of the perio...
^^
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...US tourists had still lower than the UK tourists at the end of the period. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tourists at the end of the period. in the second graph, its apparent that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...at the end of the period. in the second graph, its apparent that the...
^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...avelling was higher than the US people. for the UK tourists, growth was slow until ...
^^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...015, whilst the figures of the US people for the problem did not fluctuate over t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, still, while, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44947735192 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37897711328 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8368422384 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.428571429 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5714285714 5.23603664747 278% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262342099107 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125687748845 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564982953741 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188777255503 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729629678804 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.42 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.