The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in

one town who rode bicycles in 2011.

The table displays the percentage of bicyclist in terms of age group in a particular town in the year 2011.

In general, what stands out is that more women rode bicycles than men with the exception of the age group of 18 to 39. In addition, those aged between 0 and 9 had the highest proportion of bicyclists while the reverse was true for those of 40 to 59 years old.

over half of the 0 to 9-year-old group was bicyclists, with the figures for women and men were 52% and 51% respectively. Meanwhile, women using bicyclists accounted for 42% of the population of the next age group, whereas that of men made up just roughly a half of such figure. By contrast, female cyclists only constituted 17% of those aged from 18 to 39, which was 3% lower compared to their male counterparts.

As for the remaining age groups, which were group of citizens aged from 40 to 59 and group of citizens over 60, the figures registered under 20% for women and under 15% for men.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... that more women rode bicycles than men with the exception of the age group of 18 to 39. In addition,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...e for those of 40 to 59 years old. over half of the 0 to 9-year-old group was b...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, as for, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48876404494 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56406980854 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4308461085 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215674160862 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115041993815 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101462539483 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164684516693 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101145313315 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.