The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998.
The table compares the quantity of cacao beans produced in different parts of the world from 1992 to 1998.
Overall, between 1992 and 1994, South America was the top producer of cacao beans but it was replaced by Asia from 1996 to 1998. It is also noticeable that the production of cacao beans in Asia saw the most significant growth in the given period.
In 1992, South America produced the highest number of cacao beans at 143,000 tons and this figure dropped to a low of 112,000 tons in 1996, before increasing to 389,000 tons in 1998. Asia's production started at 119,000 tons, then rose continuously to reach a peak of 436,000 tons in the final year. Similarly, Oceania's figure began at 40,000 tons and climbed consistently for the succeeding years to hit a high of 77,000 tons at the end of the period.
The production of cacao beans in Africa was the lowest at the beginning of the period at 29,000 tons and this, then, went up to 119,000 tons in 1996, before reducing to 25,000 tons in 1998, which remain to be the lowest figure. In North America, the amount of cacao being produced started and ended with the same figure at 46,000 tons, while in England it hovered between 43,000 and 67,000 throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d from 1992 to 1998. Overall, between 1992 and 1994, South America was the top...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant growth in the given period. In 1992, South America produced the high...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67431192661 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32128675327 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9781190153 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190960467658 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119000158106 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874552290698 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177569938015 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920033502912 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.