The table below shows the production of cacao bean in six regions between 1992 and 1998.
The illustration provides data on the manufacture of cacao bean in North and Central America, Africa, Asia, Oceania, South America, England from 1992 to 1998.
Overall, it's clear that Asian had the highest number in the production of cacao bean over a period of 6 years, starting from 1992. Besides, the making of cacao bean was lowest in Africa in 1992 and 1998 and in North and Central America in 1994 and 1996.
In North and Central America, there was a fluctuation between 1992 and 1998. The production of cacao bean accounted for 46000 tons in 1992 and dropped to 25000 tons in 1994, after which the figure documented an upsurges at 39000 tons and had the same level as the beginning of the examined period in 1998. In addition to, through the surveyed period, the manufacture of cacao bean of Asian and Oceania witnessed uptrends, from 119000 tons to 436000 tons and 40000 tons to 77000 tons.
From 1992 to 1994, there was an increase of the manufacture of cacao bean for Africa and England, from 29000 tons to 43000 tons and 56000 tons to 67000 tons, while the opposite was true for South America, between 143000 tons and 14000 tons. Besides, after this period, the figure went up in both 3 regions, particularly in 1998, Africa had 25000 tons, South America had 389000 tons and England had 49000 tons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an upsurge' or simply 'upsurges'?
Suggestion: an upsurge; upsurges
...1994, after which the figure documented an upsurges at 39000 tons and had the same level as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69264069264 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27539320039 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458874458874 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9115347932 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215965129914 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133149526122 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593315974686 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172513607831 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622454689025 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.