Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, people have to deal with a host of issues, including health. There is a widely held belief that the price of sugary food and drink should be increased so that the level of sugar consumption decreases, protecting people's health. I am partly in favor of this idea owing to the following grounds.
On the one hand, the compelling justification for defending the above position is related to customers' income. In other words, if sugary products are made more expensive, some people who want to save money will limit to choose these products for their meals. For example, some Africans do not use sugar because they cannot afford to buy it. Therefore, it is fairly logical to make sugary products more expensive.
On the other hand, the reason why the standpoint should be refuted is that making the cost of sugary food and drink higher cannot exert an impact on the wealthy. This is because the rich usually show their attention to quality rather than the price of goods. To illustrate, high-income workers in Vietnam often spend a large sum of their salary on meals, so they can continue to buy what they want even if there is an increase in the price of products. As a result, this trend does not affect and creates inequality between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that although expensive sugary food and drink can reduce the rate of sugar eating, this usually fails to prevent the wealthy from buying them. In the future, people should find more other solutions to ameliorate the health problems caused by sugar.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77121771218 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40073698647 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9218771882 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283532917542 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909641417025 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874164684068 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169853981108 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06814694457 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.