The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u

Essay topics:

The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set up.

The table provide us with information about investment in five year period in Us dollars in 3 forest saving environmental programs in 3 different locations on Earth. The pie chart gives us more detailed information about how money be spend.

Overall, in table we can see that budget for south-east Asia forest suitability program for 1 year are almost same as, sum of booth central America and west Africa and equal $60.5 million. The cost of projects in south-east Asia remain high for 5-year period average 40mil per year. On other hand, costs of West Africa projects are average number 5.5 mil per year max in 1 year 10.5 and minimum 2.5 year 3 and 4. The central America project cost in average are 9 million per year with stable last 3-year period 5 million.

The more detail information about First year of forest saving environmental programs given us in pie chart First, 50% of all money goes to salary for worker and stuff. Second biggest spending is Set-up cost (because of lack of infrastructure in those regions) 30%.Office expenses and training of staff cost 10% each.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Office
... of infrastructure in those regions 30%.Office expenses and training of staff cost 10%...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and training of staff cost 10% each.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85561497326 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54024767412 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.874788135 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311566102686 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14386034033 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678421119139 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183387784173 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678589257944 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.