The given tabular chart highlights the information about the seven distinct categories of families who were suffering from poverty during the year:1999. The data is calibrated in per centum and in numbers.
Overall, it is evident that 11% of total australian families were living in poverty. Among them, sole parents were significantly highest in proportion of total population, suffering from poverty, while the category of aged couple had the least amount of poverty proportion.
It can be seen that 6% people who belonged to the single aged group of people suffered from poverty followed by the aged couple(4%), living in poverty. Unfortunately, single and without children category comprised of 19% of total population who were leading a poor life whereas, proportion of couple, had no children was less in comparison of single, no children category.
With regards to the remaining categories of families, sole parents had the wide amount of total population(21%), who were going through the poverty stage of life, however, this proportion was comparatively low in the category of 'couple with children' who had 12% of total population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90877769077 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1164025046 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182767215668 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881745058351 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491318161399 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121167949727 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026586434908 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.