the table shows, there are statistical information concerning poverty of different categories of households. By summarizing the information, it would be seen that, variety of proportions in poverty have been recorded in 1999.
The majority of poverty in Australia, unfortunately, is related to sole parents and after that single families with no children would dedicate the second position for themselves in terms of poverty. The couples with children have the third rank. However, by short glimpse to table, it is obvious that, the number of parents with children is more than another kind of households in society, and it is because of population of these families on society of Australia, And The number of single family with no children is more than the number of sole parents as well, but the proportion because of the population of each group is different.
The couple with no children and single aged persons have the fourth and fifth position in term of proportion of poverty and also in terms of population. As the table would illustrate, the last position and ranking is related to aged coupled.
As the table illustrates, the proportion of poverty, in different types of families has different amounts. However, the total poverty proportion is about 11 percent and the total number of poor households is 1837000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the table shows, there are statistical info...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, third, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8457555147 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470046082949 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.5548374434 43.030603864 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273677438342 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124513023837 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921484837122 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185444986602 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871114071768 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.