The world is moving among gears of non-stop technological advancement, and people are loosing the track of time gradually. In today’s societies the most paramount role is played by the speed which can solve highly implicated problems of human beings. Therefore, having worries about it can be comprehended to some extent, and beside other high speed technologies, improving the quality of public transportation systems is compulsory.
On the one hand, the advocates of constructing new rail roads for high-speed trains may think about the issue of air pollution and also environmental protection beside considering the speed of traveling. This means that if new railways are built, the trains will consume renewable energy such as electricity power that is environmental-friendly fuel, meaning reducing pollutant rates and letting the earth refine itself in long-term.
On the other side, proponents, emphasize that it needs a large amount of budget to build new railways instead of improving them. For example, destroying a large area of residential place in order to construct new railways on them can have extra costs, ranging from the costs of buying properties from owners to the building new roads. Furthermore, preparing fundamental infrastructures for railways needs more budgets than repairing and improving them because construction is always expensive than repairing and improving. This means, the roads built before head in restoration only need enhancing the technology of trains and adopting relating rails. Sometimes, critics believe that the extra money of construction would spend on solving some existent problems of society such as poverty, unemployment, poor healthcare, drought and famine, causing longevity among people. Also, using machineries consuming fossil fuels in construction phase can add up to the problem of pollution and make the situation worse by highly long-lasting impacts on environment that sometimes cannot be compensated.
To sum up, I tend to side with the opponents of building new railways because the benefits of improving rials roads outweigh the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...chnological advancement, and people are loosing the track of time gradually. In today’s soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from the costs of buying properties from owners to the building new roads. Furthe...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rials roads outweigh the drawbacks.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63125 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13657854995 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3514938454 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.166666667 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192327667964 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641335835819 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041692266598 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991862893616 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412210059431 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.