The two pie charts provide information regarding to the ability of British students in speaking other languages at a university in 2000 and 2010.
At first, by comparing figures in 2000 and 2010, it seems that being familiar with languages in two comparing years had broadly 5% increment or stayed in the same figure. However, the ability of knowing languages soared partially by moving to the year 2010, because speaking no other languages dipped from 20% to 10%.
Knowing German and two other languages had obviously the same proportions (10%), and the figures of French language with another languages were similar in the year 2000. Interestingly, speaking Spanish with unfamiliarity with any language dedicated 50% of the chart to themselves at the same year. Turning to the year 2010, French, German and having no second language skill had the equal percents (10%), and others, ranging from Spanish, another language, and two other languages had the first to third positions respectively.
To sum up, majority of language known by students have either 5% fluctuation or no change, and furthermore, the ability of knowing other languages are increased totally in contrast with the year 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, regarding, second, so, third, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23316062176 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72583183614 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 290.88556701 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0688035833 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 76.5299724578 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 16.8248392259 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 4.34317383033 266% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236938690494 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144942687116 0.0766984524023 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091507748511 0.0603063233224 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191194382547 0.12726935374 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991023385149 0.0580467560999 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 8.37731958763 203% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 8.71597938144 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.