The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart and the table inform about reasons of declining productivity of out planet’s farming lands and statistics concerning some causes in a group of regions respectively in relative years.
As pie chart illustrates, the main problems of land degradation were related to over-grazing of livestock and deforestation (65%). Furthermore, over-cultivation had third place (28%) among the reasons and other causes only had a minimum role (7%).
The table shows that over-cultivation in North America (3.3%), deforestation in Europe (9.8%), and over-grazing in Oceania were the main reasons of land degradation. Also, over-grazing and deforestation totally had less effect than over-cultivation in North America. However, in Europe over-cultivation and over-grazing totally (13.2%) had more effect than deforestation. Furthermore, over-cultivation and deforestation didn’t have significant role on land degradation in oceania. All in all, Europe, Oceania and North America had first to third places respectively in terms of total land degradation. By comparing three regions, deforestation and over-cultivation in Europe grasped the first place and over grazing in Oceania had the first rank among regions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89142857143 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67604934345 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3420003774 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136207350216 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722987124208 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732836826897 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132230485045 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590754575993 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.